Showing posts with label New World Order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New World Order. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

What happens if the nation bankrupts and who is responsible?

With any remote threat of a U.S. bankruptcy there will instant martial law. There will be a new form of government established continuing to run through the remaining reserve and it's own form of a bail out received from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). For those that thought we live in a police state now, you all have not seen nothing yet. For those aware of the Illuminati their primary power lies in the confusion and lack of attention the world places in their actions until it is too late. According to insiders who later rejected the secret society have stated that when the New World Order announces itself it's too late. That at that point it is too late. Too late to struggle, too late to protest, too late to fight. Well folks I urge you to listen, watch or get a transcript of George H. W. Bush's 1991 State of the Union Address which so coincidentally was September, 11 1991. An exact 10 years prior to the day of the September 11th attacks the first President Bush announced the New World Order.

Once again we have been so busy in our lives that we don't place these two situations together. When you mention these two in the same sentence people seem to dismiss the fact that there is any such thing as a real New World Order. Whether you choose to see it or not we are all in a regulated state. Not just by law but also media, health care, education, public services, religion, freedom to exercise constitutional rights.

These puppeteers pull the strings behind the curtain creating events for their amusement of shifting money, power and influence to forward their agenda. They ruthlessly and consistently play both sides of the coin one against the other, profiting from both sides either way. With the money to fund projects of enormous magnitudes, this money has been used to gain influence and leverage over whole nations it's leaders and it's citizens. you and I have never met these people in our lives and they have more influence on our daily living than our closest partner, friend or family member. They have influence over our television programming, wars we enter as well as others around the globe and their outcome, politics federal, local and global, pharmaceuticals, finances you name it the list goes on and on. With all of this money being circulated through an international banking system that they own.

So when everything hits the fan and you all wake up out of your slumber offended by the fact everything you believed to be freedom is no more, don't blame the political figures that live by the beliefs of the original constitution. There is nothing wrong with the constitution or those who truly believe in its premise. Instead focus on those who tend to want to restrict the freedoms the constitution allows regardless of their reason. Focus on the International bankers who profit and gather economical data from situations they created and manipulated. Don't look merely at the international banks alone, look at the banks and other institutions they own. You'll find that they own most major retail stores, oil companies, no-bid contract companies, commercial/non-commercial real estate among a host of other things.

Any money you place into their banking system is no longer yours it is theirs, and is subject to seizure or miscellaneous charges at any time for little or no reason. It's not that it really matters anyway because it just so happens these international bankers also own our Federal Reserve Bank which printed the money and loaned to us at interest anyhow. They charge you and me money to print some symbols on paper, call it money and the only thing that gives it value is the people who believes it's money and the amount in circulation. In the end real property will be confiscated, re-distributed and what we believe to be money will be transformed funds you can no longer touch but will be able to benefit from by way the credit your labor has earned on your RFID chip.

While Christians look for the "Mark of the Beast" that is it right there. The RFID chip is currently in use right now in pets, humans, passports and are actively marketed in news clips and online web-sites. the worst part about it is that the Illuminati will use our government to use a form of reverse psychology that has worked for them in the past in areas of passing gun and criminal legislation to usher in this technology. They are stellar at finding ways to make people request the very things that hurt themselves the most. Refuse this technology at any cost! No matter what you do, if you do nothing else in your life refuse this technology and understand why you should. All of this covered today is barely skinning the surface on the road to a better life for ourselves. You want freedom? Find out who these international bankers are for yourselves. Find out what they own, who they frequent with and who they have influence with. Connect them to the dots in your government and pin the dot on the donkey.

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

David Rockefeller, "Memoirs" autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

What does the deficit mean to my life?

For those that don't believe, try me. There are things happening right now in your lives that affect directly and indirectly on a daily basis and this ever growing deficit is evidence of just one range of its capability. Unfortunately there are still some of us that don't fully even understand the implications of how the deficit affects them as individuals. So for those that don't understand I will break it down for you in only a way that main stream media will not give you.

The payments that the deficit will afford will have no choice but to be taken from publicly funded programs namely healthcare, education, social security among other social projects. In the event our GDP does not cover the costs of these programs and the deficit, these programs will be cut altogether to make the payment to the deficit. You can bet your bottom dollar law enforcement funding would sustain if not enlarge in the event of these times. When the GDP just barely covers the payment of the deficit, military, law enforcement and bureaucratic pockets it's a wrap. Our officials will publicly declare our once wealthy nation bankrupt.

The unraveling of all this can happen at any given time as we are already suffering the pre-stages of this chain of events. I don't think anyone envisioned government authorized tax-payer funded bailouts coming in a million years. Just the same way the public would like not to believe anyone capable of flying two planes into buildings or buildings falling that weren't hit by planes for that matter. Even with indisputable evidence the true verdict on 9/11 has yet to be served or investigated thoroughly. Whoever would of thought about a potential housing bust or the dot com bust of yester year? Who is forward thinking enough to foresee everything we deem valuable eventually becoming worthless? What will life be like then? In this very answer lies the importance of the national deficit in your life.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Has the thought of a lack of time consumed our mind? Pt. 2

How many of us legitimately have time to read legislation? How many of us know what to do in the event we don't like what we have read? How many of us are really concerned if just a couple of little ol stinking rights are taken away? As crazy as it sounds there are people that don't care saying crazy stuff like, we needed to have that right taken to protect us since times have changed from the days the constitution had been drafted. A prime example of this lunacy are contemporary gun laws that often receives the same argument and in most cases ban guns that have not been used in any crimes and does not curb any violent crime rates at all.

All gun laws do is take guns out of the hands of the law abiding citizen, place them in the hand of the criminals who never sought conventional means of purchasing fire arms anyway and make it harder for the average citizen to protect themselves. A majority of crimes take place outside of the home vs inside. Try nowadays to protect yourself without going to jail for being successful at it now. It is extremely important to be aware any infringement on our constitutional rights whether warranted or unwarranted as well as the proper channels to take to circumvent or protest such abuses.

The Patriot Act sold many of rights down the river. this Act in addition to others contain dozens of pieces of legislature we generally have no knowledge of until we are personally affected. Luckily we have groups such as the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) among others that fight the types of issues. To this day they still call for reform of this act although they have already forced some modest changes in it's provisions. They have sued the DOJ challenging the constitutionality of the NSL's (national security laws) the act awarded. In April 2004, they filed suit against the government on behalf of an unknown Internet Service Provider who had been issued an NSL, for reasons unknown. In ACLU v. DoJ, the ACLU argued that the NSL violated the First and Fourth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution because the USA PATRIOT Act failed to spell out any legal process whereby a telephone or Internet company could try to oppose an NSL subpoena in court. The court agreed, and found that because the recipient of the subpoena could not challenge it in court it was unconstitutional.

Congress later tried to remedy this in a reauthorization Act, but because they did not remove the non-disclosure provision a Federal court again found NSLs to be unconstitutional because they prevented courts from engaging in meaningful judicial review. Prior to all of this although reported afterward in November 2005, BusinessWeek reported that the FBI had issued tens of thousands of NSLs and had obtained one million financial, credit, employment, and in some cases, health records from the customers of targeted Las Vegas businesses. Selected businesses included casinos, storage warehouses and car rental agencies. An anonymous Justice official claimed that such requests were permitted under section 505 of the USA PATRIOT Act and despite the volume of requests insisted "We are not inclined to ask courts to endorse fishing expeditions".


Critics such as EPIC and the ACLU strongly criticized the law for violating the Fourth Amendment. In 2004, FBI agents used this provision to search and secretly examine the home of Brandon Mayfield, who was wrongfully jailed for two weeks on suspicion of involvement in the Madrid train bombings. While the U.S. Government did publicly apologize to Mayfield and his family, Mayfield took it further through the courts. On September 26, 2007, judge Ann Aiken found the law was, in fact, unconstitutional as the search was an unreasonable imposition on Mayfield and thus violated the Fourth Amendment.

Laws governing the material support of terrorism proved contentious. It was criticized by the EFF for infringement of freedom of association. The EFF argues that had this law been enacted during Apartheid, U.S. citizens would not have been able to support the African National Congress (ANC) as the EFF believe the ANC would have been classed as a terrorist organization. They also used the example of a humanitarian social worker being unable to train Hamas members how to care for civilian children orphaned in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, a lawyer being unable to teach IRA members about international law, and peace workers being unable to offer training in effective peace negotiations or how to petition the United Nations regarding human rights abuses. Another group, the Humanitarian Law Project, also objected to the provision prohibiting "expert advise and assistance" to terrorists and filed a suit against the U.S. government to have it declared unconstitutional. They succeeded, and a Federal Court found that the law was vague enough to cause a reasonable person to guess whether they were breaking the law or not. Thus they found it violated the First Amendment rights of U.S. citizens, and struck it down.

Perhaps one of the biggest controversies involved the use of NSLs by the FBI allows the FBI to search telephone, email, and financial records without a court order. However the most troubling aspect of the USA PATRIOT Act is the immigration provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of any alien whom the Attorney General believes may cause a terrorist act. Russell Feingold, in a Senate floor statement, claimed that the provision "falls short of meeting even basic constitutional standards of due process and fairness [as it] continues to allow the Attorney General to detain persons based on mere suspicion". Before the USA PATRIOT Act was passed, Anita Ramasastry, an associate professor of law and a director of the Shidler Center for Law, Commerce, & Technology at the University of Washington School of Law in Seattle, Washington, accused the Act of depriving basic rights for immigrants to America, including legal permanent residents. She warned that "Indefinite detention upon secret evidence — which the USA PATRIOT Act allows — sounds more like Taliban justice than ours. Our claim that we are attempting to build an international coalition against terrorism will be severely undermined if we pass legislation allowing even citizens of our allies to be incarcerated without basic U.S. guarantees of fairness and justice." This is just one of several acts that have horrid potential, most of which I will cover in future posts.

There have been many other critics of this Act as well. However we can not take for granted the the small number of those who do fight for any particular issue or trust in our heart of hearts that our viewpoints will be represented accurately and whole heartedly unless we do that for ourselves. But how can we do it if we have no time?

We are in a shameful political where congressional figures claim not to have time to even read the legislation they pass. Let's not forget the revealing scene Michael Moore displayed in his critically acclaimed blockbuster Fahrenheit 9/11 where Congressman Jim McDermott alleging that no Senator read the bill and John Conyers, Jr. as saying "We don't really read most of the bills. Do you know what that would entail if we read every bill that we passed?" Congressman Conyers then answers his own rhetorical question, asserting that if they did it would "slow down the legislative process".

Mainstream media conglomerates that place real issues on the back burner in order to supply force fed issues, financial institutions making money hand over fist receiving bailouts. I just don't understand why everyone knows the stimulus money would be better spent in the terms of giving every tax paying citizen a check, and not one voice was heard saying so until after the stimulus had passed with Rep. Ron Paul (R) Texas stating this on the D.L. Hughley show of all places (CNN) 3/8/2009. No disrespect to Mr. Hughley but Rep. Paul's argument would have been better made on the congressional floor as well as unamiously accepted by the public. Leaving only the bureaucracy to further expose their lack of regard on truly stimulating the economy. Which is one of my main concerns of the stimulus plan.

Naturally people would take that money and place it right back into the economy. Certainly there are those that would go shopping blowing their whole check on clothes and jewelry. Just as well as their would be those that would invest in stocks/bonds, small bussinesses of their own, an existing business that would invest in their infrastructure etc. Speaking of infrastructure that is where the stimulus is going, to rebuild the infrastructure of the United States.

Which on one hand is not a bad thing unless your industry of profession has no way to capitalize on these rebuilding plans or has no way to benefit from industries that do. Which is no way a direct stimulus. The government at this point would never consider or support giving each adult American a check when they have such a rare opportunity to rebuild infrastructure. Which of course will help bridges, parks and roads. But let's take into account the technology that has developed in recent years. Technology that is ever more intrusive into the privacy of our citizens. Always look at the underlying factors associated with any major moves from Washington.

It's completely understandable with this complete lack of time to study these types of things, but it is extremely imperative that we do so. Otherwise you will perhaps one day find ourselves the victims of a plethora of things we are unaware of such as video cameras on every corner, higher police to citizen ratios, our phone calls under constant surveillance, martial law type practices and RFID chips to monitor your every move and transaction. Money is being taken from education to fund these types of projects everyday, nine thousand layoffs of California teachers alone as you read these words. The national statistics are virtually similar across the board.

The underlying goals of RFID technology in relation the New World Order is frightening and I advise you; if you have no time to look into any other issue please Google these topics together and seek the truth for yourself. In doing so you may find things you will never believe, possibly may refuse to believe as far as intent is concerned. Unfortunately that is exactly what the powers that be look for you to do. They would like nothing more than for you to leave them to their own devices, dismiss any opposition as unfounded or mere conspiracy theory. Whatever you do, do not accept, purchase or volunteer to accept any type of RFID technology whether on your person or products containing these chips. This for all you religous buffs is the real life Mark of the Beast you have read about for centuries! Don't believe me? Find the time to prove me wrong. I warn you in advance I as well as people of my caliber and greater, of incredible stature have predicted by way of open minded reasoning these wars and financial collapses among other things to happen!

Qoutes courtesy of Wikipedia.org